Regardless of who it is, it will have been a
hard-fought battle, with a combination of everything, from deep intrigues,
violence, poisonous rhetoric and a cut-throat competition in which some egos
will be deflated while some will swell like roadside mandazi.
First, the lack of creativity in President William
Ruto’s regime shocks me quite a bit. As he is desperate to win a second term in
2027, I’ve always imagined that he and his ruling coalition would go out of
their way to make a statement in Ol Kalou.
They apparently wanted to show that
the government was willing to let electoral processes like the recent by-election proceed without the perception of
state high-handedness. They are keeping their eye on the bigger prize than the
local poll for MP.
In any case, Ol Kalou, before this by-election, was
an opposition seat held by a Jubilee member. There would be, in my view, no net
loss if the ruling UDA was beaten in this by-election.
It would help entrench a
public belief, however weak, that the regime will not go out of its way to try
and manipulate the more important 2027 general election.
If anything, the new
MP will be sworn in and begin reelection campaigns immediately, making the
remaining period largely inconsequential in the bigger legislative and
political agenda on both sides of the divide.
The political war between President Ruto and his
former deputy, Rigathi Gachagua, has been characterised by such hate rhetoric
that the Ol Kalou contest boiled down to a fight between their egos.
Indeed, it
was difficult to notice that the seat’s “defending champion’, the Jubilee party
of former President Uhuru Kenyatta, had a candidate there too.
Elections in the
region have recently taken up the format of those with Ruto versus those with
Gachagua. The poisoned environment didn’t allow for a middle ground.
The country itself is almost exactly one year away
from a potentially divisive and delicate election. The fierce ethnic and
political rhetoric will most likely get worse, the closer we get to the
election.
Which is why the country is in desperate need of statesmen and
pacifiers to help tone down the rhetoric and
heal ethnic divisions, to avert a large-scale rejection of the
results of the 2027 general election.
And let’s face it, the existing leaders,
from the President himself, are unable to walk back from the charged atmosphere
and assure an anxious nation that all will be well.
The first sign of trouble is the rising goon
culture in the country. Just last Sunday, there were two attacks, one targeting
Nairobi Senator Edwin Sifuna and Siaya Governor James Orengo in a Kisumu
church.
The other was the vicious disruption of a rally held by their Linda
Mwananchi colleagues in Nyahururu. In both cases, the police were accused of
either inaction or complicity in the attacks.
Truth be told, pro-government rallies never get
disrupted anywhere in the country, so we can conclusively tell who is to blame
for most of the attacks.
Regime propagandists would have you believe that
opposition politicians organise attacks on their own rallies and spice it up by
“kidnapping themselves to gain sympathy”.
We are obligated, however, to remain
sensible and reject such foolish utterances, even if they come from high
places.
If anything, the responsibility of the security establishment is to
investigate and arrest perpetrators of criminal acts, regardless of how they are
planned.
It is easy to see why the Ol Kalou by-election
became such a do-or-die contest. For Gachagua, the perception that he has
locked up the mountain and become the undisputed regional king is important for
his own political survival.
Having his DCP’s maiden MP emerge from this process
was always going to be more than just a mere contest.
As he fights in court to
invalidate his impeachment and open the path onto the 2027 ballot for himself,
he can’t afford other parties and interests staking a claim to the mountain
pie.
For Ruto, the shrinking electoral map, in terms of
his victorious 2022 support, places him in a delicate position, requiring him
to maintain a semblance of influence in erstwhile bases such as Central.
Granted, there is a lot of disenchantment among sections of his previous
supporters, but the President has an election to try and win in just a year.
He
can’t afford the growing perception that a large part of this support is
slipping like sand through his fingers.
The bigger picture, however, is how Ruto handles
such tight contests, because Kenyans automatically interpret his posture and
reactions to these by-elections as a pointer to how he will handle the 2027 election,
especially if they don’t go his way.
In a recent pronouncement, the President
declared that “the world won’t stop” if he loses the general election.
He urged
Kenyans to stop focusing too much on “terms”, whether wantam or tutam,
a reference to the divide between those oppose his reelection and those who
want his reelection.
But if these words are to mean anything, state
machinery must seem to align with them. It doesn’t augur well if armed, masked
men in unmarked cars pop up along the roads during the campaigns, intimidating
citizens.
Even worse and all too prevalent in Ol Kalou were the blatant acts of
bribery and “development for votes” philosophy, whereby voters were enticed to
vote for the ruling party candidate in exchange for promises of development
projects.
Incidentally, this model unfolded in the exact same
area way back in 1995, when the current Ol Kalou constituency was part of the
larger Kipipiri constituency.
At that time, the death of the local MP, Laban
Muchemi of Ford Asili, occasioned a by-election in which the ruling party,
Kanu, audaciously attempted to win the seat.
Perhaps because Kenneth Matiba’s Ford Asili was in
the fading-out stage, President Moi must have figured that his party stood a
fair chance against Mwai Kibaki’s DP in the by-election.
State machinery
descended on Kipipiri, with “development” and good old-fashioned bribes to sway
voters.
Electricity poles landed in glory, as road construction equipment
landed to start works. The constituency was on the cusp of bliss.
However, when the results were in, DP’s Mwangi
Githiomi had won by a landslide. The state promptly responded by removing all
development equipment it had taken to Kipipiri. It turned out that the “gifts”
and “development” had been tied to the voters’ decision.
Elderly Ol Kalou
voters no doubt remembered this, as the same method was deployed in the just
concluded by-election. Whether this campaign template swayed voters this time
is for the results to tell.
But if the uncompromising manner of the Ol Kalou
contest reflects on the ultimate environment of the 2027 general election, then
a few things will have emerged to worry well-meaning citizens.
To start with,
the ethnic undertones around these campaigns need to tone down. Additionally,
the use of state machinery to intimidate or bribe voters doesn’t sit well in
such a charged atmosphere.
But of all players in this, the ability of the IEBC
to deliver a credible election will have been tested in Ol Kalou, as a
precursor to what we can expect in 2027.
I am truly hoping that the commission
will internalise the lesson that in a country where elections are almost always
disputed, restoring the ballot as a trusted transition process is crucial to
national stability. That’s because we can’t bank on fraudulent elections
forever.
Ol Kalou therefore gave the country the chance to test its electoral
systems, view the “trailer” and proceed to correct areas that need correction,
a year ahead of time. I hope we grab the opportunity.