logo
ADVERTISEMENT

Administrators warn buyers to keep of Sh10bn Kanyotu land in Ruiru

Lawyers say property still locked up in a succession matter pending before the High Court

image
by Peter Obuya

News27 September 2025 - 15:23
ADVERTISEMENT

In Summary


  • The late Kanyotu, who was a director of Kangaita Coffee Estate Limited, held 4,995 out of 5,000 shares in the company, effectively controlling 99.9 per cent of the estate.
  • The administrators of the estate—valued at over Sh10 billion—revealed that despite court orders, some individuals are purporting to sell the property to unsuspecting members of the public.

Vocalize Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Vocalize

GAVEL




Administrators of the estate of former spy chief James Kanyotu have warned buyers against purchasing land belonging to the Kangaita Coffee Estate Limited in Ruiru.

In a caveat through AM Wahome & Company Advocates, the administrators cautioned that the land parcel LR No 11261/76, registered under Kangaita Coffee Estate Limited, is the subject of ongoing litigation in the High Court Succession Cause No 1239 of 2008.

The late Kanyotu, who was a director of Kangaita Coffee Estate Limited, held 4,995 out of 5,000 shares in the company, effectively controlling 99.9 per cent of the estate.

The administrators of the estate—valued at over Sh10 billion—revealed that despite court orders, some individuals are purporting to sell the property to unsuspecting members of the public.

“Any transactions carried out in disregard of these orders would be void ab initio and of no legal effect,” the administrators said.

They asked potential buyers and interested parties to exercise caution and verify ownership details to avoid falling victim to fraudulent schemes.

The property in question remains tied up in succession proceedings, pending determination by the High Court.

In July, the Environment and Land Court ruled that the 500-acre property remains part of Kangaita Coffee Estate Limited, where Kanyotu was the majority shareholder, bringing to an end a long-running dispute involving multiple companies and alleged transactions.

Delivering his judgment on July 10, Justice Oguttu Mboya ruled that the sale of the land was illegal, null and void.

The court found that previous orders issued in 2010 in a succession case relating to Kanyotu’s estate had expressly prohibited any dealings with the land, making any subsequent transactions unlawful.

The court heard that, despite these restrictions, Kangaita Coffee Estate’s land was purportedly sold to Trendsetters Investments Limited for Sh700 million and later to Marriott Africa International Limited for Sh750 million.

Marriott later transferred the land to Ukombozi Holdings Limited.

In his testimony, Marriott’s director, Abdul Hassan, told the court that the company purchased the land for Sh750 million and paid Sh15 million in stamp duty.

“While still under cross-examination, the witness testified that the suit property was sold for the sum of Sh750,000,000 only. Furthermore, the witness testified that the plaintiff bought the entire suit property and not a portion thereof,” the judgment read.

The director also stated that Marriott’s majority shareholder was Ukrainian and denied any links to other parties mentioned in the proceedings.

However, the court heard that Marriott and Trendsetters shared the same business address, raising questions about the close relationship between the firms.

Margaret Nyakinyua, one of Kanyotu’s widows and a director of Kangaita Coffee Estate Limited, testified that she had not been consulted on the sale of the land.

Nyakinyua told the court she was unaware of the transactions until long after they occurred. She stated that no proceeds from the alleged sale were ever received by the company or the beneficiaries of Kanyotu’s estate.

Nyakinyua further claimed she was approached with an offer of Sh50 million to withdraw the case.

She, however, declined the offer, insisting the land belonged to Kangaita Coffee Estate and remained part of her late husband’s estate.

Another family member, Willy Kanyotu, also testified that Ukombozi Holdings had been selling portions of the land despite the existing court orders barring such transactions.

Two forensic document examiners, Chief Inspector Bernard Cheruiyot and Vincent Chelongo, testified that some of the land control board consents presented to facilitate the transfers were forged.

Justice Oguttu ruled that Marriott could not claim a clean title because Trendsetters, from whom it acquired the land, held no valid title due to the caveats and existing court orders.