In a tightly contested and hotly watched by-election, UDA’s Leo Wamuthende has emerged winner of the Mbeere North parliamentary seat, solidifying the party’s hold in Embu County.
Wamuthende secured 15,802 votes, edging out his nearest rival, Newton Kariuki (also known as Newton Karish), who garnered 15,308 votes.
Celebrations erupted across Siakago, Mutuobare, Kanyuambora and other towns in the constituency, with supporters carrying Wamuthende on their shoulders, chanting victory slogans.
A proxy battle turned battleground
for Mt. Kenya politics
What began as a routine by-election — triggered by the elevation of former MP Geoffrey Ruku to Cabinet in March 2025 — morphed into a high-stakes duel between the camps of two of Kenya’s most powerful political figures: Kithure Kindiki, the sitting Deputy President, and his predecessor, Rigathi Gachagua.
Kindiki
personally led rallies for Wamuthende across Mbeere North in the run-up to the
polls, casting the contest as a referendum on delivering development and
continuity of government-funded projects.
According to him, electing Wamuthende was vital for completion of major works — including roads, water and electricity infrastructure, and water-reticulation projects from the Kiambere Dam.
On the other side, Gachagua threw his weight behind Kariuki. His campaign adopted a grassroots approach: door-to-door canvassing, village-level outreach, and appeals to voters to resist what he described as “state-sponsored politics.”
The rivalry injected national-level political significance into a constituency by-election, turning Mbeere North into a proxy arena for broader power tussles within the Mt. Kenya region.
Claims of intimidation, bribery and political violence mar the contest
The build-up to the by-election was marred by mutual accusations of attempted election rigging, intimidation and vote-buying.
Gachagua
accused the government and UDA of sponsoring goons, paying youth for their IDs,
and mobilising cash to sway voters — alleging that up to Sh 600 million was
being used to influence the outcome.
He further raised alarms over social-media videos threatening violence, naming senior officials as allegedly behind the threats, and appealed to the Inspector General of Police for protection.
The UDA, for its part, rejected the allegations. The party countered that its campaign had been peaceful, and that the opposition’s accusations were part of “melodramatic reactions” meant to discredit Wamuthende’s bid.
During
his final rallies, Kindiki warned that anyone seeking to disrupt peace would be
dealt with firmly by the government. He urged constituents to exercise their
democratic rights without fear.
Despite the tense climate, initial reports from polling day suggested that voting largely proceeded, though isolated pockets of unrest were reported — with both camps blaming each other for alleged voter-bribery and intimidation.
What Wamuthende’s win signals for Embu and beyond
Wamuthende’s victory represents more than just a local political win. Analysts suggest it consolidates UDA’s dominance in Embu County and signals a wider strengthening of Kindiki’s influence in Mt. Kenya East.
For Wamuthende personally, the win elevates him as one of the region’s rising youthful political figures — with a development-oriented campaign that resonated with voters.
For opposition forces, particularly those aligned to Gachagua, the narrow defeat may prompt a reassessment of strategy ahead of the 2027 general elections.
The strong showing by Kariuki suggests persistent appetite among voters for an alternative to the ruling party — but also underlines the challenge of overcoming the weight of state machinery when it is fully mobilised.
Broader implications: why Mbeere North matters
By-elections such as Mbeere North have repeatedly been described by political pundits as “small elections, big impact”: though they concern a single constituency, the winners and losers can shift power balances across regions.
In this case, the contest has become a bellwether for the larger contest inside Mt. Kenya politics — where allegiances, personalities, and regional influence often define electoral outcomes. The high-profile involvement of two deputy presidents — incumbent and former —elevated the stakes, suggesting this was more than a by-election: it was a referendum on competing visions for the region’s political future.
For UDA, the win underscores its ability to deliver — not only the ballot but promises of development.
For
the opposition, it offers both a lesson and a challenge: winning under pressure
and in the face of formidable state mobilization will demand sharper strategy
and deeper grassroots engagement.
